Could
this also be a statement saying that Victorian women should know their place? Disregarding
Jo, it is easy to see that Dickens does not fully appreciate women such as Mrs.
Jellyby, having their own business outside of the home. To quote an article
that I read about this subject Joan Manheimer argues in her essay called “Murderous
Mothers” that “The woman in the house was caught in a dialectical dance with
the demons at the door” (531). I personally believe that Charles Dickens is
making an argument that women can have a right to stand up for themselves and
think for themselves, but no matter how much they like it or not the home
cannot function without them. Esther goes about and does as she pleases but she
is still always there to manage the house affairs and to support her loved ones
whenever she needs to, and the same goes for Caddy. She helps maintain the
family business, but she still knows her place as a wife and mother and is
there for her family when need be. Dickens’ is making it quite obvious that
women really do need to be the angel in the house.
Saturday, April 7, 2012
The Angel in the House
The mothers in Bleak
House aren’t very good role models. It’s kind of surprising how obvious
Dickens’s theme of family structure is. Not only is this book about class, but
it is about the home and family unit as well. He makes it clear that women are
the center of the family structure. The obvious example is Mrs. Jellyby; she is
so obsessed with Africa that her home is in shambles. Without her guidance her
home is in ruins. Another example is Esther; she is so organized that she keeps
the house in peace. Esther knows that her duty as house keeper comes first, and
because of this she is able to maintain a proper household. The next idea to point out is the amount of
orphans in this book. I believe that it is show three levels of the family
unit. First there is the functional unit; this would be considered the
residence of bleak house itself. Despite the fact that they really are not all
related it is still a fully functional household where everything is taken care
of. The next step would then be the Jellyby household; everyone had a roof over
their heads, but they still are not in the best situation ever. Then finally
there is Jo who has no family whatsoever. I believe that the biggest statement
being made here is that having a mother is always better than having no mother
at all.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
When I think about Dickens' fiction more generally, it's hard to identify a lot of strong and present mothers or mother figures. Could Dickens' early experiences of being sent to work in a factory have influences the way he portrayed parents/mothers in his novels?
ReplyDelete